Exotic dancers who claim they were held against their will and photographed by San Diego, Ca law enforcement officers throughout a compliance raid can move forward using their lawsuit, a federal judge ruled this week.
The 24 dancers, who definitely have worked at the Cheetahs or Expose strip clubs, claim the officers violated their constitutional rights through the raids July 15, 2013, and March 6, 2014.
In line with the complaint, five to 15 law enforcement officers went to the clubs throughout the early-evening hours and ordered the san diego female strippers right into a dressing room, where these folks were told to hold back until called, the lawsuit said.
The officers then questioned the dancers, who had been scantily clad, checked their city-issued adult entertainer permits, asked about tattoos or piercings and photographed them.
The lawsuit claims several of the officers “made arrogant and demeaning comments towards the entertainers and ordered these to expose parts of the body so they could ostensibly photograph their tattoos.”
The dancers say the process lasted a lot more than one hour, and once several asked should they could leave, police threatened all of them with arrest and stationed officers at the exits, the suit says.
Lawyers for San Diego police asked the judge to dismiss the lawsuit, saying the search and seizure was reasonable as organized through the city’s permitting law, allowing police inspections of adult entertainment businesses. Police have mentioned that cataloging tattoos is a simple method to identify dancers who regularly change their appearances.
“Submitting photographs and providing identification during reasonable inspections, to avoid losing a permit, is qualitatively diverse from stripping right down to undergarments, huddling in the dressing room for approximately an hour, and submitting to a photo shoot that involved the exposure of intimate parts of the body, to prevent arrest,” he wrote.
The judge is likewise allowing the lawsuit to travel forward with a false-imprisonment claim as well as a Monell claim, which can hold supervisors liable for the actions of lower-ranking officers if 70dexmpky could be proven that this behavior was part of an extended-standing custom or practice throughout the Police Department.
Even though judge agreed using the city that three raids within a year don’t total a “long-standing” or “widespread” practice, the judge also cited comments with a police spokesman who told the media that such raids were routine.